Turkic morphology seen by the Arabic grammarians. The passive

Accès gratuit

Numéro		Histoire Epistémologie Langage Volume 42, Numéro 1, 2020 La grammaire arabe étendue


Page(s)		73 - 92
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/hel/2020004
Publié en ligne		28 septembre 2020

Al-Andalusī, ˀAbū Ḥayyān. Kitāb al-^ˀIdrāk fī lisān al-^ˀAtrāk. Ed. by A. Caferoǧlu. Istanbul: Evkaf. 1931. [Google Scholar]
— Kitāb Manhaj al-sālik fī al-kalām ˀalā Alfīyyat Ibn Mālik. Ed. by S. Glazer. New Haven CT: American Oriental Society. 1947. [Google Scholar]
— Irtišāf al-Ḍarab fī Lisān al-ˁArab, vol. I, II, III. Ed. by. M.A. al-Namās. Cairo: Al-Madanī. 1984, 1987, 1989. [Google Scholar]
Halasi-Kun, T. ed. Al-Tuḥfa al-Zakiyya fī al-Luġa al-Turkiyya / La langue des Kiptchaks d’après un manuscrit arabe d’Istanbul, II, Édition phototypique. Budapest: Bibliotheca Orientalis hungarica. 1942. [Google Scholar]
Houtsma, M. Th. ed. Tarǧumān Turkī wa-Aǧami wa-Muġālī / Ein türkisch-arabisches Glossar nach der Leidener Handschrift. Leiden: Brill. 1889. [Google Scholar]
Ibn Al-Muhannā, Ǧ.‑D. Kitāb Hilyat al-Insān wa-Halbat al-Lisān. Ed. by M.R. Kilisli. Istanbul: Matbaa-ı Âmire. 1921. [Google Scholar]
Al-Kāšġarī, M. Dīwān Luġāt at-Turk. Facsimile edition of Ali Emiri 4189. Ankara: Kültür Bakanlıǧı [Ministry of Culture]. 1990. [Google Scholar]
Kilisli, M.R. ed. Kitāb al-Qawānīn al-Kulliyya li-Ḍabt al-Luġa al-Turkiyya. Istanbul: Evkaf. 1928. [Google Scholar]
Abboud-Haggar, S. 2006. Dialects: Genesis. Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics 1, 613-622. Leiden: Brill. [Google Scholar]
Al-Balushi, R. 2016. Omani Arabic: More than a dialect . Macrolinguistics, n^o 4/4: 80-125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Auezova, Z.‑A. 2005. Mahmud Al-Kashgari: Diwan Lughat at Turk. Kazakhstanskie Vostokovednye Issledovanii︠a︡. Almaty: Daik Press. [Google Scholar]
Ayoub, G. and Versteegh, K., eds. 2018. The foundations of Arabic linguistics, III, The development of a tradition: Continuity and change. Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics 94. Leiden: Brill. [Google Scholar]
Baalbaki, R. 2009. Aṣl. Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics 4, 192-195. Leiden/Boston: Brill. [Google Scholar]
Bazzi-Hamzé, S. 2007a. Fā^ˁil. Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics 2, 83-84. Leiden/Boston: Brill. [Google Scholar]
— 2007b. Fi^ˁl. Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics 2, 90-96. Leiden/Boston: Brill. [Google Scholar]
Belova, A. Gr. 2009. South Semitic languages. Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics 4, 300-315. Leiden/Boston: Brill. [Google Scholar]
Berta, Á. 1998. Middle Kipchak. In The Turkic languages, ed. by L. Johanson and É.Á. Csató, 158-166. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
Bohas, G. and Guillaume, J.‑P. 1984. Étude des théories des grammairiens arabes, 1, Morphologie et phonologie. PIFD 112. Damascus: Institut français de Damas. [Google Scholar]
Carter, M.G., ed. 1981. Arab linguistics: An introductory classical text with translation and notes. Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series 3, Studies in the history of linguistics 24. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Clauson, G. 1965. An Eastern Turki-English dictionary . By Gunnar Jarring. Lunds Universitets Årsskrift, N. F. Avd. 1, Bd. 56, Nr. 4. Pp. 338. C. W. K. Gleerup, Lund. 1964. Kr. 50. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, n^o 97/1: 57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
— 1972. An etymological dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Google Scholar]
Dankoff, R. and Kelly, J., eds. 1982-1985. Maḥmūd al-Kāšγarī, Compendium of the Turkic dialects (Diwān Luγāt at-Turk). 3 vols. Sources of Oriental languages and literatures; Turkish sources 7. Cambridge MA: Harvard University. [Google Scholar]
Ermers, R. 1999. Arabic grammars of Turkic: The Arabic linguistic model applied to foreign languages & translation of ^ˀAbū Ḥayyān al-^ˀAndalusī’s Kitāb al-^ˀIdrāk li-Lisān al-^ˀAtrāk. Studies in Semitic languages and Linguistics 28. Leiden/Boston/Cologne: Brill. [Google Scholar]
— 2007. The use of morphological patterns in Arabic grammars of Turkic. In Approaches to Arabic linguistics presented to Kees Versteegh on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, ed. by E. Ditters & H. Motzki, 435-453. Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 49. Leiden/Boston: Brill. [Google Scholar]
Girod, A. 2007. Impersonal Verb. Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics 2, 315-318. Leiden: Brill. [Google Scholar]
Johanson, L. 1998. The structure of Turkic. In The Turkic languages, ed. by L. Johanson and É.Á. Csató, 30-66. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
Khawla, M.F. 2012. Al-muṭāwa^ˁa wa-ta^ˀṣīṣu-hā fī al-^ˁArabiyya . Majallat Jāmi^ˁat Tikrīt Li-l-^ˁUlūm al-Insāniyya, n^o 19/10: 122-135. [Google Scholar]
Larcher, P. 2003. Le système verbal de l’arabe classique. 1st ed. Didactilangue. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l’université de Provence. [Google Scholar]
— 2009. Verbs. Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics 4, 638-645. Leiden/Boston: Brill. [Google Scholar]
— 2012. Le système verbal de l’arabe classique. 2nd ed. Manuels. Aix-en-Provence: Presses universitaires de Provence. [Google Scholar]
Maalej, Z. 2008. Middle verbs. Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics 3, 224-227. Leiden/Boston: Brill. [Google Scholar]
Maróth, M. 2009. Qiyās. Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics 4, 11-14. Leiden/Boston: Brill. [Google Scholar]
An-Nādirī, M.A. 1995. Naḥw al-luġa al-^ˁarabiyya: Kitāb fī qawā^ˁid an-naḥw wa-ṣ-ṣarf. Beirut: Al-Maktaba al-^ˁAṣriyya. [Google Scholar]
Owens, J. 1988. The foundations of grammar: An introduction to Medieval Arabic grammatical theory. Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series 3, Studies in the history of the language sciences 45. Amsterdam/Philadelphia PA: J. Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
— 1990.Early Arabic grammatical theory: Heterogeneity and standardization. Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series 3, Studies in the history of the language sciences 53. Amsterdam/Philadelphia PA: J. Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
Redhouse, J.W. 1890. A Turkish and English lexicon. Shewing in English the significations of the Turkish terms (Re-pr. 1978). Istanbul: Çaǧrı Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
Róna-Tas, A. 1998. Proto-Turkic and the Genetic question. In The Turkic languages, ed. by L. Johanson and É.Á. Csató, 67-80. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
Saad, G.N. 2019 [1982]. Transitivity, causation and passivization: A semantic-syntactic study of the verb in Classical Arabic. Library of Arabic Linguistics 4. New York: Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Şahan Güney, F. 2006. Functions of the so-called passive morpheme −(I)l- in Kazakh . Bilig, n^o 36: 125-137. [Google Scholar]
Sheyhatovitch, B. 2018. The distinctive terminology in Šarḥ al-Kāfiya by Raḍī l-Dīn al-^ˀAstarābāḏī. Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics 96. Leiden: Brill. [Google Scholar]
Simeone-Senelle, M.‑Cl. 1997. The Modern South Arabian languages. In The Semitic languages, ed. by R. Hetzron, 378-423. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
Soltan, U. 2009. Transitivity. Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics 4, 535-542. Leiden/Boston: Brill. [Google Scholar]
Versteegh, K. 1995. The explanation of linguistic causes: Al-Zaǧǧāǧī’s theory of grammar: introduction, translation, commentary. Amsterdam studies in theory and history of linguistic science 75. Amsterdam/Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
— 1997. Landmarks in linguistic thought III: The Arabic linguistic tradition. Routledge History of Linguistic Thought Series. London/New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
— 2014. The Arabic Language. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. [Google Scholar]
Yavrumyan, M. 2006. Das System der Verbalstämme in der Arabischen linguistischen Tradition. Elemente der morphologischen und semantischen Analyse. Bayreuth: Universität Bayreuth. [Google Scholar]